Date: 5/8/02
THE BEGINNING OF A REVOLUTION - ARE PARENTS BOYCOTTING PUBLIC
SCHOOLS?
By: Wendy McElroy
Published in the May 15, 2001 issue of Ether Zone.
Take your children out of public schools.
That's what James Dobson, founder of the conservative Christian organization
Focus on the Family, told more than five million American listeners in a March
28 broadcast of his daily radio show.
"In the state of California ... I wouldn't put [a] youngster in a public school,"
Dobson bluntly stated. His words sparked a campaign that reveals the extent
of parental discontent with public schools.
Why are they discontented? Some parents worry about the lack of religious or
"moral" values; other parents point to low academic standards or bias against
male students. (Dobson objected to "homosexual propaganda" that teaches, for
example, that "bisexuality is normal.")
The common denominator is that parents wish to choose the values and standards
by which their children are educated.
The campaign against public schools snowballed April 9 when the popular radio
personality Dr. Laura Schlessinger declared, "I stand with Dr. James Dobson."
Indeed, Dr. Laura did not restrict her comments to California.
"Take your kids out of public schools," she advised. The same day, in his Christian
talk show Point of View - broadcast over 360 American radio stations - Marlon
Maddoux added his agreement.
Marshall Fritz, founder of the Separation of School and State Alliance, described
the power of these endorsements in an April 15 press release. SSSA has created
an online Proclamation for the Separation of School and State. In the week following
the broadcasts, signatures on the proclamation increased from an average of
five per day to over 100. Then, on April 23, Fritz circulated an excited memo.
An article in WorldNetDaily had reported on the controversy. In one day, the
proclamation received over 2,500 new signatures.
The document reads simply, "I proclaim publicly that I favor ending government
involvement in education." But the companion list of ten benefits to "school
liberation" states as number one, "Parents will be reinforced ... parents will
choose schools where teachers support their values." Other benefits include
safety, academic quality, decreased cost, and better schools for poor children.
From the list it is clear that the anti-public school movement is pro-education
in a grassroots sense that returns responsibility for children from the government
to parents.
The backlash against public schools comes in the wake of recent horror stories
in the media. Some deal with threats to children's safety - and not merely from
fellow students with weapons. ABC News reported on a Head Start program that
used cockroaches to discipline children. One boy who was subjected to the cockroach
punishment at age five remains so afraid of bugs three years later that he refuses
to go outside.
Other reports question academic standards. The April 16 Philadelphia Inquirer
reported that, for the first time, Pennsylvania would release test results for
math and reading by race, poverty and sex. This sparked fears that the quality
of future education a child would receive might hinge on race, poverty and sex.
Indeed, since the 2000 publication of Christina Hoff Sommers' The War Against
Boys, accusations that boys are second-class citizens within the public schools
have become commonplace.
What seems to stir up the most anger, however, is the teaching of politically
correct values to children against parental wishes. In January, the Pacific
Justice Institute filed a lawsuit on behalf of distressed parents against a
California school that conducted allegedly pro-homosexual assemblies without
notice or parental consent.
As parents remove their children from the public schools, however, governmental
resistance to alternative education will probably increase. The most vulnerable
alternative is likely to be homeschooling. Stories such as that of California
mom Sandra Sorenson may become more common.
The Sorensons decided to set up their own private school after their 10-year-old
son's public school initiated a policy of having fellow students issue suspensions
to each other, which teachers would sign. "Children should not have the power
over other children," Sandra explained. "Nine and 10-year-olds shouldn't be
giving out suspensions. Kids can be mean."
As a result, she is facing a possible jail sentence for "contributing to the
delinquency of a minor" and claims to have been harassed severely by school
officials.
For example, the California Child Protective Service investigated the family
based on a complaint filed by the son's former principal. The complaint alleged
that Sorensen did not provide proper medical attention for her son's diagnosed
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. A standard treatment recommended by
public schools is the powerful and controversial drug, Ritalin. The CPS investigator
found the allegations to be unfounded.
Despite such risks, parents seem more likely than ever before to remove their
children from "the system." With reports of homeschooled children outperforming
those educated by government schools in national spelling bees and on some tests,
parents who would never resist authority in any other area seem willing to step
forward for the sake of their children's well-being.
Perhaps Marshall Fritz is correct in believing that Dobson's statements could
signal the beginning of a revolution.
http://etherzone.com/2002/mcel051502.shtml
****************************************
"Whenever legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the
people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put
themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved
from any further obedience."- - John Locke, 1690
********************************************
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority.
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the
people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who
mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good
masters, but they mean to be masters." -- Daniel Webster