Innocence vs. Ignorance
These children do not know what
it means to be "cool" because nobody has taught them. What other
children think about them has little meaning. What their parents and their
God think of them is what they have come to value, as it has been what has
been held up to them as the appropriate standard.
The boys crochet and are not afraid to be artistic.
The girls have no conflicts with seeing their stay at home mother as their
model, and they love their father as the only man in their life.
All of the children understand
what love is, and they experience it continually, both from their parents
and from each other. Sibling fights are nonexistent. "Tattling"
on one another just to gain some favor from a parent or someone else would
never cross their minds. Most often, what one does, the others do too, unless
it is a private project, such as making a gift, in which case one or more
siblings may be complicit in keeping the secret.
Age differences have no significance
to them. The youngest is special because he is youngest and the oldest because
she is oldest, but no superiority or inferiority applies to either position
because of age. Everybody jumps in to help with the youngest, and he never
lacks for companionship.
All of the children help with
the household chores. Doing dishes, setting the table, fixing meals, cleaning
bathrooms, folding laundry, sweeping floors, etc., are responsibilities shared
by all, while some chores, like taking out the trash, are considered masculine
and fall to the boys. Nothing is beneath anyone, however.
These children do not know that
they are "supposed" to act differently or to have age-related problems
and responses based on becoming "teenagers," "adolescents,"
or now, "tweens." They would probably find such a concept laughable
if they were exposed to it, which thankfully, they are not. Nor are they receptive
to marketing campaigns aimed at influencing them to buy certain products or
to whine at and cajole their parents until they give in and buy what they
want.
Not that they are missing out
on anything. No, they play in traditional ways, finding roles to fulfill that
come natural. The boys make bows and arrows and play Davy Crocket or whatever
historical figure they are learning about, while the girls naturally play
out the feminine counterparts to those roles. They are enjoying childhood
while learning from the example of their parents (and from other worthy examples
that their parents choose to place in front of them) what adult roles to aspire
to.
These are children who will never
lack for something creative and productive to do. They will not reach an age
at which certain responsibilities are thrust upon them and say, "Now
what?" Neither will they sit around and wait for someone else to tell
them what to do. Leadership will come naturally to them, not because they
are accustomed to taking it by force on the playground, but because they,
having become accustomed to acting in an adult fashion, will know their way
around in an adult world where others will not, so others will follow. They
will not be easily led by the "prettiest" or the "biggest"
or the "strongest" unless they also see in that person legitimate
authority to act responsibly and to do the right thing.
If it has not been deduced yet,
these children are homeschooled, taught everything that they need to know
by their parents. They are not disadvantaged by forced association with groups
that others choose for them or artificially segregated by age or apparent
ability.
And these children are innocent
in the spirit of Romans 16:19. They are not ignorant, unless such ignorance
is necessary for their innocence, but neither are they exposed to all manner
of "realities" that exist in the "real world." They, therefore,
will always have the ability to think outside of that box.
Now, how many reformers are as
blessed? Most try to clean up the sty where they live without stopping to
ask why they are living in a sty. They do not know how to think outside of
the box because they do not understand that they are living in a box. They
are, thus, truly ignorant, and that is not the same thing as innocent. In
matters schooling, for example, most cannot think in terms that exclude government
schools entirely, having been conditioned to believe that government responsibility
for education is appropriate or at least necessary for many. Whether the issue
is taxes, or money, or debt, or government, or health, or privacy, or education,
most of us live inside of the box and are scared to look outside. Let me challenge
you to do otherwise.
Ben Graydon - published in The Times Examiner, 9-18-02