"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman 

Home

Against the Grain


Livid Leigh

Boilin' Ed

D. Tom

The Informer

Knowledge is Freedom

Privacy

Links

Court Case

Contact Us

 

© 1994 - 2007
Against the Grain

Site Design, Hosting and Logo
by DNA Web Media

 

 

Against the Grain

Silence at school has parents talking

Meadowfield Elementary's new quiet rule gets mixed reviews from parents, teachers
By GINA SMITH - Staff Writer for The State
1-11-2004

At Meadowfield Elementary School in Columbia, [S.C.] silence among students isn't a preference - it's a requirement.

When the school's 600-plus students returned from winter break Tuesday, they couldn't banter in the hallways or swap stories in the cafeteria, thanks to a new silence policy.

Instead, students read books while waiting for the school day to begin and listen to classical music in the school's corridors and cafeteria.

The change has parents talking; some say the policy goes too far. They'll discuss the new policy with school leaders at a meeting Monday.

"This is going overboard," said Billy Smith, a father of two Meadowfield students. "I grew up talking to my friends during lunch and using those socialization skills. Kids need that."

Smith and others say their children don't like the policy either. It was all they could talk about when they got home. A committee of parents and teachers came up with the idea to thwart bad behavior and inappropriate conversations among students.

"I don't know why, but during the last few years, they (students) haven't had as much control of themselves," said Meadowfield teacher Lisa Curtis, who chaired the committee.

"Even parents were saying that it seems a little more chaotic in the halls. You could tell the climate was changing and we needed to change with it." So the group decided silence was the best policy.

But it's not a permanent change.

If students do a good job of keeping mum, they'll soon be allowed to whisper. They'll also get lessons on what's appropriate conversation for school.*

"Not everyone knows what it means to whisper," said Paula Stephens, the school's principal. "But everyone knows what silence is. We're starting with that as our baseline." Stephens argues the policy is not as restrictive as critics think. Lunch is only 20 minutes. And most schools require silence in the hallways, she said.

Eventually, Meadowfield will install a traffic light in the cafeteria. A green light will mean students can talk freely. But it will change to a yellow warning light if the talk gets too loud. And if students don't get the message, the light will turn red, requiring silence.

For now, many of the teachers are loving the silence policy, Curtis said. "It's amazing how well it's working," she said. "The learning environment is better. The students are being more polite. There's no bickering. I'm so proud of them."

But some parents say it's unfair punishment.

"I'm surprised at how inclusive the rule is," said Lee Crabtree, mother of a Meadowfield fourth-grader. "What about the ones that do their work and behave appropriately in school? They're being punished, too."

Reach Smith at (803) 771-8378 or gnsmith@thestate.com.

* Those who understand what the agenda is in our government controlled schools should continue to fight this latest effort to turn students into little robots, totally under the control of the NEA guidelines for "social/culture change in the school system - formerly known as "education". The court has determined that parents may not be forced into drugging their children in order to send them to school. So, the next step for the schools is to deny normal activity by 10-11 year old children. When young minds are not engaged in "learning" to read and math geared to the correct age group, problems arise. The new crop of teachers is not being taught how to teach academics, but how to turn children into the new socialist society. Read the posted latest prosposals by the NEA and decide if this is what you want for your children. ATG

\