Silence at school has parents talking
Meadowfield Elementary's new quiet rule gets mixed reviews from parents, teachers
By GINA SMITH - Staff Writer for The State
1-11-2004
At Meadowfield Elementary School in Columbia, [S.C.] silence
among students isn't a preference - it's a requirement.
When the school's 600-plus students returned from winter break Tuesday, they
couldn't banter in the hallways or swap stories in the cafeteria, thanks to
a new silence policy.
Instead, students read books while waiting for the school day to begin and
listen to classical music in the school's corridors and cafeteria.
The change has parents talking; some say the policy goes too far. They'll
discuss the new policy with school leaders at a meeting Monday.
"This is going overboard," said Billy Smith, a father of two Meadowfield
students. "I grew up talking to my friends during lunch and using those
socialization skills. Kids need that."
Smith and others say their children don't like the policy either. It was all
they could talk about when they got home. A committee of parents and teachers
came up with the idea to thwart bad behavior and inappropriate conversations
among students.
"I don't know why, but during the last few years, they (students) haven't
had as much control of themselves," said Meadowfield teacher Lisa Curtis,
who chaired the committee.
"Even parents were saying that it seems a little more chaotic in the
halls. You could tell the climate was changing and we needed to change with
it." So the group decided silence was the best policy.
But it's not a permanent change.
If students do a good job of keeping mum, they'll soon be allowed to whisper.
They'll also get lessons on what's appropriate conversation for school.*
"Not everyone knows what it means to whisper," said Paula Stephens,
the school's principal. "But everyone knows what silence is. We're starting
with that as our baseline." Stephens argues the policy is not as restrictive
as critics think. Lunch is only 20 minutes. And most schools require silence
in the hallways, she said.
Eventually, Meadowfield will install a traffic light in the cafeteria. A green
light will mean students can talk freely. But it will change to a yellow warning
light if the talk gets too loud. And if students don't get the message, the
light will turn red, requiring silence.
For now, many of the teachers are loving the silence policy, Curtis said.
"It's amazing how well it's working," she said. "The learning
environment is better. The students are being more polite. There's no bickering.
I'm so proud of them."
But some parents say it's unfair punishment.
"I'm surprised at how inclusive the rule is," said Lee Crabtree,
mother of a Meadowfield fourth-grader. "What about the ones that do their
work and behave appropriately in school? They're being punished, too."
Reach Smith at (803) 771-8378 or gnsmith@thestate.com.
* Those who understand what the agenda is in our government controlled
schools should continue to fight this latest effort to turn students into little
robots, totally under the control of the NEA guidelines for "social/culture
change in the school system - formerly known as "education". The court
has determined that parents may not be forced into drugging their children in
order to send them to school. So, the next step for the schools is to deny normal
activity by 10-11 year old children. When young minds are not engaged in "learning"
to read and math geared to the correct age group, problems arise. The new crop
of teachers is not being taught how to teach academics, but how to turn children
into the new socialist society. Read the posted latest prosposals by the NEA
and decide if this is what you want for your children. ATG