America has a very rich heritage.
Arguably, the two most important principles that contribute to that heritage
are property rights and decentralized governance. Both were novel concepts
at the time of our nation's founding, and both are largely responsible for
much of the liberty we hold dear today.
Sadly, property rights and local governance
are under a constant, vicious attack by "command and control" advocates
on the left. The newest threat to these bastions of American liberty comes
in the form of federal bill H.R. 2388, The National Heritage Areas Policy
Act." Sponsored by Rep. Joel Hefley (R-CO) H.R. 2388 is due for a vote
in the House of Representatives within the next few weeks.
H.R. 2388 creates a process whereby National
Heritage Areas are created. It dangles federal tax dollars under the noses
of the states, essentially begging them to designate land as a Heritage Area.
Once land is designated, it is subject to the whim of the National Park Service,
thus setting the state for a myriad of property rights abuses and land grabs.
Supporters of H.R. 2388 are quick to claim that their bill provides protection
against land acquisition and does not allow federal oversight of Heritage
Areas. They say that Heritage Areas are simply official designations that
help local communities tell a story about some specific, culturally unique
aspect of their history. However, those of us grounded in reality know the
true nature of Heritage Areas, their history of ravishing property rights
and how H.R. 2388 will encourage their creation.
Heritage Areas are not simply honorary designations.
They are vehicles for "sustainable development." Once a locality
receives a "Heritage Area" designation, that locality's zoning laws
become subject to the whim of the federal government. And that whim often
shuns property rights in favor of radical environmentalism. Federal control
over local zoning practices can occur one of two ways. It can occur directly,
in a binding contract between state and federal agencies. Or it can occur
indirectly, with the federal government dispersing funds to environmental
agencies or preservation groups, who then draw up zoning plans that meet their
narrow vision of the world. This second vehicle is the most sinister, as it
gives the impression that local control is preserved, when in reality, the
federal government is just peddling its influence through another party.
Already a bad bill, H.R. 2388 has a propensity
to become even worse as it travels through the legislative process. That is
because amendments and revisions can and will be made on the House floor prior
to voting. And if history any indicator, those amendments may be something
to fear.
Land Acquisition
Liberal Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV)
is one of the biggest proponents of H.R. 2388. (It should be noted that Rep.
Rahall presides over the poverty stricken Coal Heritage Area in West Virginia.
A shining example of how Heritage Areas squelch economic development.) When
H.R. 2388 was being considered for a vote in the House Resources Committee,
Rahall proposed an amendment to allow land acquisition authority. Luckily,
his amendment was rejected. HOWEVER, H.R.2388 will go through a similar process
before the full House of Representatives, AND there is little doubt that Rahall
and any number of his land-grabbing cohorts will lobby to include land acquisition
in H.R. 2388.
The Heritage Areas Act is by no means new to
the scene. It existed in the form of H.R. 5044 back in 1994 when it passed
the House but later died in the Senate. Back then, Reps. Hefley and Rahall
both sponsored an "Early Action" section in the Heritage Areas Act.
What exactly are "Early Actions?" Let them tell you in their own
words:
Section 106 (4): "EARLY ACTIONS: After designation of an
American Heritage Area but prior to approval of the management plan for that
area, the Secretary may provide technical assistance for EARLY ACTIONS that
are important to the theme of the area and that protect resources that would
be in imminent danger of irreversible damage without such actions."
So basically, Hefley and Rahall wanted the National
Park Service to provide cash and direction to local governments to do their
tyrannical dirty work. "Early Actions" provide the bureaucrats in
charge with the power to halt development in areas that are merely proposed
for Heritage Area designation. Want to build a house on YOUR property? Not
so fast! This area could eventually become a Heritage Area, and we think your
house would endanger valuable resources. Never mind that it's your property.
Never mind that the Heritage Area doesn't even officially exist. NO house
for you.
This was the motivation of Congressman Hefley
and Rahall on the same bill back in 1994. There is no reason to believe it
is not their motivation today. When H.R. 2388 comes before the House of Representatives,
anything can happen.
Economic Development
Supporters of the Heritage Areas
Act are desperately trying to impress upon an increasingly gullible public
that Heritage Areas are conducive to economic development. That this can be
said with a straight face is nothing short of incredible. The enactment of
zoning restrictions is hardly a recipe for economic health. In fact, stifling
development usually spells misery for local economies, and in these uncertain
times, the last thing communities need are federally-induced barriers to economic
growth.
Proponents argue that Heritage Areas attract
tourism dollars. Tell that to the people in West Virginia's economically depressed
Coal Heritage Area. Fortunately, the hypocrisy of H.R. 2388's supporters knows
some bounds. Even they couldn't bring themselves to pen the words "economic
development" in the actual text of the Heritage areas Act. Perhaps such
buzzwords would have offended the bill's green supporters?
United Nations Encroachment
Another aspect of the Heritage
Areas Act's sordid past bears mentioning. The 1994 version of the bill had
a provision that allowed Heritage Areas to be designated as United Nations
World Heritage Sites at the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Interior.
Section 105 (b) (3) stated that
the Interior Secretary shall "consider any American Heritage Area, designated
under this or any other Act, for the nomination to the World Heritage List
if the Secretary determines that such area meets the qualifications for such
nominations." No hearings, no debate, no nothing.
Wow! Just imagine what Clinton's
Secretary of Interior, Bruce Babbitt, could have done with this.
A Bad Bill Then and a Bad Bill Now
The National Heritage Areas Act
was a bad bill in 1994 and it is a bad bill now. Furthermore, it has the propensity
to become even worse once it lands on the House floor for amendments and debate.
When congressional committee
hearings were held on H.R. 2388, the bill's sponsors purposefully shutout
property rights groups from voicing their concerns. Both the American
Land Rights Association and the Property Rights Foundation of America requested
to testify and both were rejected. Clearly, Reps. Hefley and Rahall are
not concerned with the adverse ramifications that the Heritage Areas Act will
wreak on property owners. In fact, during debate on the bill, perennial property
rights champion Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA) offered a commonsense amendment
to H.R. 2388. Rep. Pombo's amendment simply called for property owners to
be notified when their land falls within the boundaries of a Heritage Area.
Incredibly, Rep. Hefley and his cohorts voted down this amendment! IT seems
that they would rather landowners be caught off-guard when the National Park
Service comes for their property.
The National Heritage Areas Policy Act is
just the latest attempt by the federal government to purchase influence over
local communities and their zoning practices. This is not what our Founding
Fathers envisioned. They founded our nation on the bedrock of property rights
and federalism. That is our heritage. H.R. 2388 seeks to snuff it out.
Peyton Knight is legislative director the
American Policy Center
The DeWeese Report
98 Alexandria Pike, #43
Warrenton, VA 20186
Phone: 540-341-8917