"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman
© 1994 - 2007 Against the Grain Site Design, Hosting and Logo by DNA Web Media
Albert Coombs v. Sprint and AT&T
Case appealed to SUPREME COURT of the united States..........Dockett # 00-6105
Prelude
Tacit Procuration/Initial Complaint Submitted as Evidence
Complaint
Letter to NC Attorney General
Appeal Brief
Demand for Default Judgment
Order denying Default Judgment
Order of dismissal
Order denying rehearing
Illegal Phone Charges
Petition for Writ of certioriari (Questions for Review)
U.S. Supreme Court Pleading
Supplemental Brief to Petition of Certiorari
Response to Respndents Objection of Certiorari
Letter to Rehnquist
Letter to Clerk of U.S. Supreme Court
GAO Report on Illegal Charges http://www.techlawjournal.com/telecom/80331gao.htm
New Letter to Sprint
Letter to Committee of Utilities
7-23-2004 Notice of Default to Sprint
Letter to Sprint Billing
Sprint Controls the PUC Letter from PUC to Coombs
Response to PUC Letter of August 27, 2004
NC Staff Attorney Letter
Sept.16 E-Mail to PUC Attorney
Re: Sprint Inquiry
Letter to Fanta
NOTICE and DEMAND
Tax Service Response
Fax to Sprint
Reimbursement of Federal Excise Tax
Confirmation of Credit Letter
Telephone Messages 1899
The End Result of All Court Cases On The Phone Charges
The latest update on the FET on telephones
\