"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman 

Home

Against the Grain


Livid Leigh

Boilin' Ed

D. Tom

The Informer

Knowledge is Freedom

Privacy

Links

Court Case

Contact Us

 

© 1994 - 2007
Against the Grain

Site Design, Hosting and Logo
by DNA Web Media

 

 

Court Case of Importance

Albert Coombs v. Sprint and AT&T

Case appealed to SUPREME COURT of the united States..........Dockett # 00-6105

Prelude

Tacit Procuration/Initial Complaint
Submitted as Evidence

Complaint

Letter to NC Attorney General

Appeal Brief

Demand for Default Judgment

Order denying Default Judgment

Order of dismissal

Rehearing brief

Order denying rehearing

Illegal Phone Charges

Petition for Writ of certioriari (Questions for Review)

U.S. Supreme Court Pleading

Supplemental Brief to Petition of Certiorari

Response to Respndents Objection of Certiorari

Letter to Rehnquist

Letter to Clerk of U.S. Supreme Court

GAO Report on Illegal Charges
http://www.techlawjournal.com/telecom/80331gao.htm

New Letter to Sprint

Letter to Committee of Utilities

7-23-2004 Notice of Default to Sprint

Letter to Sprint Billing

Sprint Controls the PUC
Letter from PUC to Coombs

Response to PUC Letter of August 27, 2004

NC Staff Attorney Letter

Sept.16 E-Mail to PUC Attorney

Re: Sprint Inquiry

Letter to Fanta

NOTICE and DEMAND

Tax Service Response

Fax to Sprint

Reimbursement of Federal Excise Tax

Confirmation of Credit Letter

Telephone Messages 1899

The End Result of All Court Cases On The Phone Charges

The latest update on the FET on telephones

\