It Doesn't Matter That a Man's Constitutional Rights
Were Deliberately Violated
The Policeman Cannot Be sued

August 4, 2007

Hello, Folks;

In Wray v. United States, 2nd Circuit No. 05-3341-cv, Mr. Wray sued the government and two police officers who arrested him by mistake, as a supposed robber of a restaurant. The police then conducted a contrived and unduly suggestive line-up which got Wray indicted as the robber and convicted. Mr. Wray was successful in a federal habeas corpus proceeding and had the conviction tossed out.

Nonetheless, Mr. Wray had to endure being jailed, tried, convicted, and imprisoned due to police misconduct, and, as subsequently said by the 2nd Circus, also due to acts by the judge and prosecutor which were unlawful.

Mr. Wray then sued under Title 42 §1983, for damages.

The same 2nd Circus clowns denied him relief and explained away the misconduct as not unconstitutional, but only due to "the violation was caused by the ill-considered acts by the prosecutor and trial judge."

The 2nd Circus said that due to the acts of the judge and prosecutor, the police could not be held liable.

Have you ever heard of a more absurd and irrational way to explain away behavior that cost Mr. Wray a fortune in legal costs, lost time in prison, and destruction of his reputation in the community?

This is exactly why we must say "We are tired, and you are fired!"

Join The NO Vote Party today and help save others from a similar and unfair fate.

D. Tom