|
71st Congress, 3d Session . .
. . . . House Document No. 825, Vol. III
Papers Relating to
the
Foreign
Relations
of the
United
States
1930
(In Three
Volumes) Volume
III
United States
Government Printing Office
Washington: 1945
LIBERIA 459
APPOINTMENT OF CHARLES I. McCASKEY AS
ACTING FINANCIAL ADVISER TO THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA IN THE ABSENCE OF JOHN
LOOMIS (35)
882.51a/86
The Acting Secretary of State to
Mr. Nelson Stuart, Assistant Trust Officer of the National City Bank of New
York
Washington, January 30, 1930. SIR: I acknowledge receipt of your letter of January
27,(36) addressed to Mr. J.P. Moffitt (37) of the State Department, quoting a
cable from the Financial Adviser (38) that he is recommending Mr. McCaskey,
Acting Financial Adviser. It is understood that Mr. McCaskey, who was formerly
Supervisor of Internal Revenue, is at present Supervisor of Customs in
Liberia. Article 8 of the Loan Agreement (40) provides for the
nomination of the Financial Adviser by the President of the United States but
there is no provision as to the appointment of an Acting Financial Adviser
during the former's absence on leave. The Department would be pleased therefore
to learn whether you consider it necessary to have Financial Adviser nominated
by the President. In the case of Mr. Bussell (41) who was commissioned in 1928
Acting Financial by the President of Liberia, (42) during the absence of Mr, De
la Rue, (43) the Financial Adviser at that time, the formality of a nomination
by the President of the United States was not followed. Should it be deemed
necessary formally to nominate Mr. McCaskey, I would be pleased to receive
biographic data to submit as is customary to the President should he be
recommended.
Very truly
yours,
For the Acting Secretary of State:
Prentiss Gilbert
____________________________________
882.51a/90
Mr. Nelson Stuart, Assistant
Trust Officer of the National City Bank of New York, to the Secretary of
State
New York, February 6,
1930. SIR: Receipt
is acknowledged of your letter of January 30 with reference to our letter of
January 27 (36) in which we quoted a cable
_________________________ 35. For previous correspondence, see Foreign
Relations, 1928, vol. III, pp.240 ff. 36. Not printed. 37. James P. Moffitt of the Division of Western
European Affairs. 38.
John Loomis. 39.
Charles I. McCaskey. 40. See Foreign Relations, 1926, vol. ii, pp. 574, 579.
41. Conrad T. Bussell.
42. See Foreign Relations, 1928, vol.
III, p. 246. 43. Sidney
de la Rue.
460
FOREIGN RELATIONS, 1930, VOLUME III
received from Mr. John Loomis,
Financial Adviser to the Republic of Liberia under the Loan Agreement dated
September 1, 1928 [1926]. There does not appear to be any provision in the
Agreement as to the appointment of an Acting Financial Adviser during the
absence of the Financial Adviser. The importance of a proper appointment in such
a case from our position as Fiscal Agent is found in the last paragraph of
Article XI, providing that funds in the hands of the Fiscal Agent shall only be
expended upon the request of the Secretary of Treasury of the Republic of
Liberia, certified and approved in manner and form satisfactory to the Fiscal
Agent by the Financial Adviser. In the present instance the appointment of Mr.
McCaskey would be satisfactory to us but we feel that a confirmation to Mr.
Loomis on the part of the State Department would tend to strengthen his official
status as the Acting Financial Adviser and would establish a precedent to be
followed in future cases. We have no knowledge as to the recommendation of Mr.
McCaskey for the position of Acting Financial Adviser, other than contained in
the cable from the Financial Adviser quoted in our letter of January
27.
As requested in your letter, we are pleased to enclose herewith such biographic
data concerning Mr. McCaskey(46) as we find in our files.
Very truly
yours,
Nelson Stuart
____________________________
882.51a/91:Telegram
The Acting Secretary of State to
the Charg’e in Liberia (Carter)
WASHINGTON, February 13, 1930–4
P.M. 16. Your 9, January 16, 3 p. m. (46) Department has
received letter from the National City Bank stating that Loomis will recommend
McCaskey as Acting Financial Adviser. Upon receipt of formal recommendation from
Financial Adviser and if you believe McCaskey is satisfactory to the President
of Liberia notify the Liberian Government that his appointment is approved by
this Government. The Liberian Government will doubtlessly issue as in the case
of Bussell. Refer to your diplomatic despatch No. 33 of February 15,
1928(47)
_______________
46. Not printed.
47. Despatch not printed; for its
enclosure, see Foreign Relations, 1928, vol III, p. 246.
LIBERIA
461
882.51a/112: Telegram
The Charge’ in Liberia (Carter)
to the Secretary of State
Monrovia, March 12 1930--noon.
[Received 8:25 p.m.] 33. Department's 16, February 13, 4 p.m. McCaskey
commissioned Acting Financial Adviser yesterday by President of Liberia. Loomis
left March 8 via Spain and Cuba for his home at Strasburg, Virginia, where he
will spend his leave of absence. (48) In correspondence with the
Liberian Government relating to McCaskey’s nomination, Barclay (49) a took
exception to our position that Acting Financial Adviser should be nominated by
the President of the United States but stated that in the view of the Liberian
Government the next in command (in this case McCaskey) should, in the absence of
the Financial Adviser, become Acting Financial Adviser. As the issue appeared to
be somewhat academic, I did not insist upon acceptance at this time of our view
but merely informed Barclay that I was mailing copies of the correspondence to
the Department. (50)
Carter
________________
48. John Loomis returned to Monrovia
on September 6, 1930. 49. Edwin Barclay, Liberian Secretary of State. 50. Not printed.
COMMENT: Well, all this wheeling and
dealing occurred when? What was the crash of 1929 about? Wasn’t people
put out of jobs because there was no money? Well if there was no money where
is this all coming from in 1930? Can you see the set up for FDR to help the
banking cartel when the people started demanding all their money they had put
into the banks, stocks of the J.P. Morgan and Getty, Rockefeller, and Firestone
organizations such as the United States Trading Company bank? FDR bailed
out the banks when the banks had squandered all the people’s money. Remember
that in 1921 the real Treasury of the United States was abolished and the Private
Federal Reserve Board became the fiscal agents of the United States. In 8 short
years they plundered the people’s money in all these overseas deals by
loaning money of the people, and now the people have to pay for the squandering
of the fiscal agent of Congress. Congress abdicated its' lawful position when
eliminating the true Independent Treasury of America. Rockefeller owned the
Chicago Bank and would lose all his holdings if a run was allowed on the banks;
and, FDR was his Bar buddy besides, so he protected him buy Executive Order
2039. That is why the BANKS, and not the Congress, rewrote and changed the original
statute of the Trading with the Enemy Act to make the American the "Enemy" of
the banks. This proposed law, written by the Federal Reserve Board, was entered
by FDR without any additions or deletions whatsoever. We are not the enemy of
the United States but the enemy of the banks; that is why FDR declared the emergency
banking holiday, so he could license all the banks so they could trade with
the American enemy (the people of America.). This will become very evident when
I include those portions of the Hoover Papers from January 1932 to March 4,
1933, later on in this series.

|